You, Irek, wrote that

Attorney Dmitry Dyadyura caught lanterns a spy. This is no joke. It is entered in the court records in the "case Shirshov." True, the word "spy" Dyadyura not say, but all the pathos of his speech came down to the fact that in the Moscow City Court neutralized boardroom spy. And this spy - I. Dmitry Dyadyura - left more. On Monday, lanterns when the hearing on the "case Shirshov" was adjourned for lunch, I left the room and went down to the first floor. And there is only remembered that I forgot in the hall recorder. When he returned, the door was already closed, all gone ... (because lanterns after lunch was zachitka materials of the criminal case, which I already know the process of decided not to return). Today I returned to the recorder in the Moscow City Court Bailiff. True audiofaly all been removed (or are thrown to explore). Thought the story ended and was wrong. At the beginning of the trial the prosecutor demanded Dyadyura removed from the hall of the "unknown person", which at the last meeting, "specifically left in the boardroom included recorder to record conversations that may contain sensitive information." The judge dismissed the petition. But residue remained. What is interesting prosecutor agreed with the judge during the lunch break, if so alarmed Dyadyura forgot my recorder?
Yeah, slept!
in closer as it is necessary, on-assemble!
You, Irek, wrote that "finished intelligence. Factor", lanterns and nearly came to the Academy. "Dmitry lanterns Dyadyura - left" That is not right, important and necessary clarification from the journalist. lanterns
Irek link to the case. "And several" unidentified persons "actively search for businessmen willing to pay 5.6 million euros for the deputy chair" A Blagojevich offered to sell the Senate seat from Illinois vacated Obama becoming president, just one million dollars to anyone wanting much cheaper. If Russia had bought at the state level Senate seat from Illinois, now the Crimea any bill would have made.
Only two. This is called a thread. One of your post in Livejournal, another of your article in the "New". A "together in a bunch of horses, people" incorrectly. All mixed in one Like, or Like - this is for facebook, or twitter, and LJ provides a different format. And then, when all thoughts are mixed into one, then we obtain the fantasy of "possible lanterns war" with Ukraine over Crimea, assume a much better realism.
C'mon, so pierced pierced. Have the courage to admit it.
long before the "New" ...
(Reply) (Thread)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
And I've got to court, the prosecutor asked. turning to me - And if I want to sell gas stove. before it bought mnoyuv store. I said - sell. if you want. The trial was over the house. who wanted lanterns to buy the Executive Committee for its price. and I of course - was not going to give them that opportunity and put the price for my own home. What is the meaning the prosecutor said, I have not been explained to them. Maybe he wanted me to pay that price. for which I bought the house from his cousin - all nonsense what else.
uniquely extortion. You had to bend and the prosecutor and the court. Appeal to the audience lanterns in the hall, with the requirement lanterns to make an oral statement lanterns about the crime and the refusal to give bend and Secretary and bailiffs, and protection - in fact harboring crime. And all sue until ENOC - a million profit. (No bullshit)
(Shepotom. We, the birthplace of the best - for Sutyajnik) When you are directed to the meeting, be sure to follow past three stations there (no more than a bottle) syschetsya bunch of volunteers zaschitnichat-witness ...... You claim 99 people defenders the same witnesses, and they will drink all the blood of his court nonsense ..... entitled. (Raskosheltes half a bag of seeds, let nasoryat / namarayut / other. To remember your solicitors. Turn court shows / marquees, exactly in the method FIRST LAWYER RFii: Semenova NA Invent. Improvise) lanterns
At the expense of perjury - like Saltykov-Shchedrin. lanterns I do not remember reading. that - I have 4 perjurer. For our people it's okay - she even noticed one. former neighbor. loves to drink a woman.
And he thinks the opposition if the opposition for opposition? opposition to the existing government is not against the opposition itself as such? What requirements lanterns would be brought to this opposition? This question is not in regard to this topic, but in principle to Murtazin as to the actual (not the kitchen) oppositionist. After all, not to say that the opposition needed. Such is the structure of our world - it does not change. And those who do not understand - he just had not matured, young or not trained. And in uncomprehending state - it's just lazy revolution. Who should be financed by the opposition? interested party? or she survive? to what level can be in opposition to the opposition? Let not